QUOTE (Sportbilly @ Nov 22 2008, 03:24 AM)

QUOTE (jamescolin @ Nov 21 2008, 07:17 PM)

QUOTE (Matt J @ Nov 21 2008, 03:45 PM)

how long before he is hauled off by the Red Hall Gestapo?
A load of hot air by a disgruntled Widnes fan. After going into Admin they didn't deserve a franchise. Gary Scholfield only writes as he does because he is paid to do it. Finance is at the heart of any business like it or not. The world cup made £2 million, the small nations are moving forward and I feel that we can't develope any other way. Shouting about injustices because you were not selected is futile. bet if Widnes were now in SL he wouldn't have anything to say. Lets have a constructive alternative that would generate more income (sponsors and advertising and TV ) and it would be worth reading. The ways suggested would lead us into a league of village teams with no income. I am sure the powers that be have looked at the alternatives. We were poor at the WC because we were tired, there was no zip in the team. Less games and more international experience. I would agree about stopping Aussie imports.
1 - 'Gary Scholfield only writes as he does because he is paid to do it'..........does stevo/eddie/phil do it for free like?
2 - 'The world cup made £2 million'........just think what it would make with teams that can compete with the aussies, as it doesnt affect fev, I dont give 2 hoots.
3 - 'Shouting about injustices because you were not selected is futile. bet if Widnes were now in SL he wouldn't have anything to say'.........an i bet we wouldnt be saying a great deal either if we were in it.
4 - 'We were poor at the WC because we were tired, there was no zip in the team'........we were beaten by a class outfit, one we cant compete against, we couldnt even beat a 'not as classier' outfit. You make it sound like we were the only ones to play rugby during the summer.
I'm not a businessman, but I'm no fool either. The product we have at the moment is the laughing stock of the sporting world. As a down to earth/man on the street RL fan, I can relate to the article which I feel has been well worded, regardless of who he supports.
Some good points and you make an alternative answer that is your right.
In respect of Schofield the point I am making is that he is specifically employed to be controversial, therefore he is always going to 'have a go'. What the other two you mention do is also dictated by their contracts.
Yesterday's result speaks for itself. We have got into the mind system of not being good enough that needs changing. The profit is better than RU profit for the last World Cup(they made a loss), and I feel signifies a good competition. We always seem to concentrate on the negatives.
I agree with your third comment.
Quite a few pundits agree with what I said. It is just a point of view. You could argue that we beat NZ 3-0 and they have just won the world cup. Dependes what slant you take.
I don't think the product we have is the laughing stock of the sporting world. The RU team were soundly thrashed by S.A. Everyone of the RU pundits are talking up the positives. 'Young team, more experience will come in due course, Johnson needs time' and they were pathetic. I bet there will be a different reaction in 2009 when the four nations are played. So we didn't win, NZ did by honing their product to meet the circumstances, we will do the same. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion. That is what this forum is about. It is by far the most thought provoking RL site there is and long may it remain so.